By Paul F. Steinberg
How do diversified societies reply politically to environmental difficulties worldwide? Answering this question calls for systematic, cross-national comparisons of political associations, regulatory kinds, and state-society kin. the sphere of comparative environmental politics ways this job via bringing the theoretical instruments of comparative politics to endure at the major matters of environmental coverage. This ebook outlines a comparative environmental politics framework and applies it to concrete, real-world difficulties of politics and environmental administration. After a complete evaluate of the literature exploring household environmental politics world wide, the publication presents a pattern of significant currents in the box, displaying how environmental politics intersects with such themes because the greening of the kingdom, the increase of social routine and eco-friendly events, ecu Union enlargement, company social accountability, federalism, political instability, administration of neighborhood commons, and policymaking below democratic and authoritarian regimes. It bargains clean insights into environmental difficulties starting from weather swap to water shortage and the disappearance of tropical forests, and it examines activities by means of kingdom and nonstate actors at degrees from the neighborhood to the continental. The booklet might help students and policymakers make feel of ways environmental concerns and politics are attached world wide, and is perfect to be used in upper-level undergraduateand graduate courses.
Read Online or Download Comparative Environmental Politics: Theory, Practice, and Prospects PDF
Similar environmental policy books
Foreign legislation has develop into the foremost enviornment for safeguarding the worldwide atmosphere. because the Seventies, actually 1000s of foreign treaties, protocols, conventions, and ideas less than conventional legislation were enacted to house such difficulties as international warming, biodiversity loss, and poisonous pollutants.
Kinfolk among prepared hard work and environmental teams are usually characterised as antagonistic, regularly due to the specter of task loss invoked by means of industries dealing with environmental rules. yet, as Brian Obach exhibits, the 2 greatest and strongest social hobbies within the usa really proportion a good deal of universal floor.
This edited quantity compares seven international locations in North the US and Europe at the hugely topical factor of oil and fuel improvement that makes use of hydraulic fracturing or “fracking. ” The comparative research is predicated at the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) and guided via questions: First, in each one kingdom, what are present coalitions and the similar coverage output?
- Advancing Land Change Modeling: Opportunities and Research Requirements
- Environmental Policy and Politics
- Global Warring: How Environmental, Economic, and Political Crises Will Redraw the World Map
- River science
- Oecd Environmental Performance Reviews, Portugal 2011
Extra resources for Comparative Environmental Politics: Theory, Practice, and Prospects
2006. Beyond Sun and Sand: Caribbean Environmentalisms. : Rutgers University Press. 22 Paul F. Steinberg and Stacy D. VanDeveer Bernauer, Thomas, Anna Kalbhenn, Vally Koubi, and Gabriele Spilker. 2010. A Comparison of International and Domestic Sources of Global Governance Dynamics. British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 509–538. Bernhagen, Patrick. 2008. Business and International Environmental Agreements: Domestic Sources of Participation and Compliance by Advanced Industrialized Democracies.
Studying social actors within their social histories is necessary if we are to make sense of one of the most important recent developments in global environmental politics: the rise of popular support and mobilization for environmental causes in a wide range of non-Western societies (Lee and So 1999; Baver and Lynch 2006; Christen et al. 1998). Researchers have begun to document and analyze these phenomena, but there have been few attempts to share results across regions, to take stock of the state of the art, and to identify promising directions for future collaborative research programs.
Sprinz, and Arild Underdal. 2003. The Oslo-Potsdam Solution to Measuring Regime Effectiveness: Critique, Response, and the Road Ahead. Global Environmental Politics 3 (3): 74–96. Hsiao, Hsin-Huang Michael, On-Kwok Lai, Hwa-Jen Liu, Francisco Magno, Laura Edles, and Alvin Y. So. 1999. Culture and Asian Styles of Environmental Movements. In Asia’s Environmental Movements: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Yok-shiu F. Lee and Alvin Y. So, 210–229. : M. E. Sharpe. Hunold, Christian, and John S. Dryzek.